Skip to content Skip to main navigation
Site map Arabic Urdu Slovenian Farsi Chinese French

Agenda item

Update on the Handling of Complaints of possible Breaches of the Code of Conduct for Members


Consideration was given to the a report presented by Stuart Fletcher, Service Manager, which provided an update on the handling of complaints relating to breaches to the Code of Conduct and the subsequent steps taken, which included:-


·                A complaint had been received that information allegedly provided in confidence to a member of a Parish Council was discussed at a meeting of the Parish Council. The views of the Parish Councillor have been received and the matter referred to the Independent Person for his views. A further update would be provided to the next meeting of the Committee.


·                A complaint has been received that a Borough Councillor made an inappropriate comment to an officer in relation to the issuing of a parking ticket. The views of the Councillor have been sought, but not yet received. A further update would be provided to the next meeting.


·                As an update from the last meeting a complaint was received from a member of the public that a Parish Councillor was rude and threatening to him in a Parish Council meeting. The views of the Independent Person were requested and after reviewing the relevant evidence, which included listening to a recording of the relevant Parish Council meeting, he concluded that there had been provocation of the Parish Councillor by the Complainant and that the remarks were made under duress.


As such the Independent Person felt that due to the circumstances of the case there should be no further investigation, which was concurred by the Monitoring Officer.  The complainant and the Parish Councillor were written to informing them of this decision. The complainant subsequently submitted further information in relation to this matter and asked that the issue be reviewed. This matter was currently under review by the new Monitoring Officer.


·                A complaint had been received that a Parish Councillor called a member of the public corrupt in the presence of a number of other Parish Councillors and members of the public.


The views of the relevant Parish Councillor have been sought, but none have been provided. This matter had been referred to the new Monitoring Officer for consideration and a further update would be provided to the Committee at the next meeting.


·                A complaint had been received that a Parish Councillor was offensive to a member of the public. The previous Monitoring Officer did not investigate this matter, but was informed that the matter had been dealt with by the Police through a process of restorative justice. As such the previous Monitoring Officer considered the matter to be resolved between the parties and that there was no requirement for a standards investigation to take place.

The previous Monitoring Officer wrote to the complainant and the Parish Councillor to that effect. The Parish Councillor had since contacted the current Monitoring Officer and stated that he was not acting in his civic capacity at time of the incident. The Monitoring Officer advised the Parish Councillor that as far as the Standards Committee was concerned the matter was concluded and the letter to him will be kept on file, should anything of a similar nature happen in the future. The matter was, therefore, considered to be concluded as far as the Standards Committee was concerned.


The Committee drew attention to the Nolan Principles which were the basis of the ethical standards expected of public office holders first set out by Lord Nolan in 1995 and precedence set by case law which found the former London Mayor Ken Livingstone had not been in breach of the Code and held that the Mayor had not brought his office into disrepute.


The Committee were informed that immediately following the election in May dedicated sessions, as part of Member induction, would be held specially around ethical standards and the code of conduct.


The Committee also welcomed the suggestion that the report on complaints include a date in brackets of when the complaint was received as this would serve as an aide memoire for the Committee when matters were referred to subsequent meetings.


Resolved:-  (1)  That the steps taken to resolve the complaints be noted.


(2)  That the resolution of the complaints which have now been concluded be noted.


(3)  That details of the date a complaint was received be included in all future reports.

Supporting documents: