Issue - meetings

Town Centre/Clifton Park Public Space Protection Order

Meeting: 16/09/2024 - Cabinet (Item 49)

49 Boroughwide and Town Centre/Clifton Park Public Space Protection Orders pdf icon PDF 608 KB

Report from the Strategic Director of Regeneration and Environment.

 

Recommendations:

 

  1. To carry out a consultation in relation to the future Town Centre and Clifton Park Public Spaces Protection Order

 

  1. To carry out a consultation in relation to the future Borough wide Public Spaces Protection Order specifically dealing with dog fouling  ...  view the full agenda text for item 49

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Consideration was given to the report which proposed that a consultation be undertaken with regard to the Town Centre and Clifton Park Public Space Protection Order (PSPO) and the Boroughwide Dog Fouling PSPO. The current PSPO’s were renewed in January 2024 for a period of 12 months. This period of  ...  view the full minutes text for item 49


Meeting: 10/09/2024 - Overview and Scrutiny Management Board (Item 25)

25 Boroughwide and Town Centre/Clifton Park Public Space Protection Orders pdf icon PDF 607 KB

 

Report from the Strategic Director of Regeneration and Environment.

 

Recommendations:

 

  1. To carry out a consultation in relation to the future Town Centre and Clifton Park Public Spaces Protection Order.

 

  1. To carry out a consultation in relation to the future Borough wide Public Spaces Protection Order specifically dealing with dog fouling and control.

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Cabinet Member for Finance and Safe and Clean Communities explained that The Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act (2014) provided powers to introduce PSPO’s in order to prevent individuals or groups committing anti-social behaviour (ASB) in public spaces.

 

The current Town Centre/Clifton Park Protection Order and the Borough-Wide Dog Fouling Protection Order were renewed in January for a period of twelve months. The Town Centre/Clifton Park Protection Order contained a number of conditions linked to anti-social behaviour whereas the Borough-Wide Dog Fouling Protection Order dealt with dog fouling.

 

The report proposed consultation would take place with established stakeholders to seek their views in relation to both PSPO’s and gain support for future designation, which would be sought regarding the conditions not included in the order. The number of complaints related to dog fouling across the borough had steadily increased, and anti-social behaviour continued to be a concern. He also informed members that inconsiderate and rowdy behaviour had been the most prevalent form of anti-social behaviour and had increased further in Quarter 1 of 2024/25 compared to the previous year.

 

The Cabinet Member explained that several powers that could be used against individuals committing anti-social behaviour, and the PSPO would serve as an additional tool. The town centre, considered part of the Council’s regeneration programme which included Forge Island, required available tools to address anti-social behaviour to ensure the successful completion of the projects. Members were informed that the consultation would take place over a few weeks and would involve engagement with key stakeholders including elected members, businesses, partners, and the public.

 

The Assistant Director, Community Safety and Street Scene informed members that, as indicated in the report, it was part of the legal process for introducing Public Space Protection Orders(PSPO). Public Space Protection Orders gave authorised officers, whether police or council officers, the power to take certain things against individuals committing criminal offences.

 

Members were informed that PSPOs could only be implemented where specific legal thresholds had been met, as detailed in the legal section of the report. However, PSPO’s could only be introduced where activities were carried out in a public place or were likely to impact the quality of life for those in that particular area. Furthermore, the behaviours must be persistent or continuing in nature and sufficient to justify the conditions proposed within the order. The report indicated that the Council was satisfied that these initial thresholds had been met and that the consultation was a legal necessity. The matter would then go for public consultation before being submitted back to Members to seek permission to introduce orders in the future.

 

Councillor Joshua Bacon asked a question on behalf of Councillor Tinsley, who had provided his apologies for the meeting. He enquired, whether in addition to the dog fouling PSPO, if any consideration be given to other borough-wide PSPO, such as protecting life-saving equipment. He asked if there could be a PSPO for Rotherham’s parks, such as Rother Valley, to deter swimming and stipulate that  ...  view the full minutes text for item 25