Issue - meetings

Ethical Procurement Policy

Meeting: 07/07/2025 - Cabinet (Item 24)

24 Ethical Procurement Policy pdf icon PDF 190 KB

Report by the Strategic Director of Finance and Customer Services.

 

Recommendations:

 

That Cabinet:

 

  1. Formalise the support of the UK Steel Charter as the successor to the Sustainable British Steel Charter.

 

  1. Approve the updated Ethical Procurement Policy for 2025.

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Consideration was given to the report which presented the updated Ethical Procurement Policy, attached at Appendix 1 of the report, for approval. The report also asked Cabinet to formalise the support of the UK Steel Charter as the successor to the Sustainable British Steel Charter.

 

Ethical behaviour was at the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 24


Meeting: 02/07/2025 - Overview and Scrutiny Management Board (Item 18)

18 Ethical Procurement Policy pdf icon PDF 190 KB

 

Report by the Strategic Director of Finance and Customer Services.

 

Recommendations:

 

That Cabinet:

 

  1. Formalise the support of the UK Steel Charter as the successor to the Sustainable British Steel Charter.

 

  1. Approve the updated Ethical Procurement Policy for 2025.

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

At the Chair’s invitation the Cabinet Member for Finance and Community Safety introduced the report noting the following:

  • The Council spent approximately £425 million annually with third-party suppliers and contractors across a wide range of goods, works, and services.
  • Procurement was seen as a key enabler for the Council to deliver its strategic objectives, using its purchasing power to drive social, economic, and environmental improvements for residents and society at large.
  • The Council must comply with the Procurement Act 2023, which provided the legal framework for public procurement.
  • The Ethical Procurement Policy consolidated a range of measures, decisions, and commitments the Council had made over the years to promote ethical practices.
  • Originally approved in January 2020, the policy was reviewed on a three-year cycle.
  • The aim was to create a comprehensive umbrella policy that centralised all ethical procurement-related decisions and practices.
  • One notable update was the Council’s intention to sign the UK Steel Charter, which replaces the previously signed Sustainable British Steel Charter.

 

The Strategic Director for Finance and Customer Services made the following points to provide additional context:

  • The policy was now reviewed annually, although most changes were typically minor (e.g., updates to dates or legislation titles).
  • The UK Steel Charter update was the main reason the policy was brought to members for review this time.
  • The policy included a commitment to support the charter through the pre-procurement business case process, ensuring alignment with the Council’s ethical and sustainability goals.

 

The Chair invited members of the Overview and Scrutiny Management Board (OSMB) to raise questions and queries on the points raised earlier.

 

Councillor Blackham queried if anyone had assessed how much the Ethical Procurement Policy was costing the Council, considering that requiring suppliers to meet ethical standards was likely to increase their costs? The Assistant Director Financial Services acknowledged that the ethical requirements likely increased costs, but it was extremely difficult to quantify. Procurement tenders did not break down costs by ethical components, so the Council could not isolate or measure the financial impact of these requirements.

 

Councillor Blackham followed up by asking if the Council was now centralising procurement? The Strategic Director for Finance and Customer Services explained that the procurement process (rules, regulations, tendering) was centralised, but actual purchasing was done by individual services who knew their needs. Centralisation of procurement professionals had been in place since 2016. The Strategic Director for Finance and Customer Services went on to clarify that while purchasing was decentralised, the Council did aggregate spend where possible (e.g. IT, food contracts) to secure better value.

 

Councillor Yasseen asked how the Council ethically screened what was included in the policy? Who decided what went in, and was there a framework? The Assistant Director Financial Services explained that major procurements were guided by a business case process, which included ethical considerations. The Council used government lists (e.g. for modern slavery) and internal assessments to guide decisions.  The Service Manager explained that before tenders went to market, a horizon scan and market assessment was  ...  view the full minutes text for item 18