Issue - meetings

Localism Act 2011 and Code of Conduct for Members and Co-opted Members (report herewith)

Meeting: 10/05/2012 - Standards and Ethics Committee (Item 38)

38 Revised Code of Conduct pdf icon PDF 47 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Further to Minute No. 194 of the meeting of the Cabinet held on 25th April, 2012, consideration was given to a report to Cabinet which set out proposals to ensure the Council had a Code of Conduct in place prior to the new standards regime coming into force on the 1st July, 2012 to reflect the mandatory requirements of the 2011 Act in relation to standards.

 

The Code could thereafter be reviewed and revised in consultation with the Leader, Deputy Leader and the Leader of the Opposition with a recommendation for adoption by full Council.

 

Resolved:-  That the report be noted.


Meeting: 25/04/2012 - Cabinet (Pre-Intervention - 2nd June 2004 to 4th February 2015) (Item 194)

194 Localism Act 2011 and Code of Conduct for Members and Co-opted Members pdf icon PDF 47 KB

-        Strategic Director of Resources to report.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Councillor Akhtar, Deputy Leader, introduced a report by the Strategic Director of Resources, which detailed how the current standards regime was set to end on 30th June, 2012 and the following day the new standards regime under the Localism Act 2011 implemented. 

 

The Act swept away the current statutory provisions under the 2000 Local Government Act, including a requirement to have a statutory Standards Committee and a Code of Conduct based on a statutory model. 

 

There would, however, be a statutory duty to promote and maintain high standards of conduct by Members and Co-opted Members and in discharging that duty the Council must adopt a Code of Conduct setting out what was expected of Members when they were acting in that capacity.

 

It was largely for the Council to determine the composition of its new Code of Conduct with the only mandatory requirements being that it complied with the seven principles of public life (the Nolan Committee principles) and contained appropriate provisions for the registration of pecuniary and non-pecuniary interests.  Disclosable pecuniary interests (“DPIs”) were a key change which would be detailed in regulations issued by the Secretary of State.  Members would be required to register disclosable pecuniary interests and not take part in any discussion or vote on an item in which they had a disclosable pecuniary interest.

 

A Member who had a disclosable pecuniary interest in an item of business would commit a criminal offence by failing to disclose it, taking part in the discussion and voting on that item.  There would, however, not be a requirement to leave the room while the item was discussed.  Consequently, it was recommended that the Council’s Standing Orders be revised to include such a requirement. 

 

There had been some delay in implementing the provisions of the 2011 Act that applied to standards and, in particular, the regulations defining what would constitute disclosable pecuniary interests have not yet been published.

 

Consequently, as the Government’s stated intention was to bring the new standards regime into force on 1st July, 2012 it was suggested that to avoid the possibility of the Council not having a Code in place the Cabinet recommend to full Council the re-adoption on the implementation date (subject to any transitional period in relation to the implementation of the new Code) of the new standards regime the current Code of Conduct for Members and Co-opted Members as revised by the Monitoring Officer, in consultation with the Leader and Deputy Leader, to reflect the mandatory requirements of the 2011 Act in relation to standards. 

 

The Monitoring Officer could thereafter review the revised Code and prepare a report and draft Code for consideration by the Cabinet with a view to recommending the adoption of a Code of Conduct by the Council. 

 

The Cabinet sought clarification on the issue of disclosable pecuniary interests and welcomed further information once the position became clearer.

 

Recommended:-  (1) That, subject to any transitional period in relation to the new standards provisions, on the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 194