Issue - meetings

Regeneration and Environment

Meeting: 10/01/2018 - Overview and Scrutiny Management Board (Item 81)

81 Budget Scrutiny Follow Up pdf icon PDF 60 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Further to the budget scrutiny meetings of the Overview and Scrutiny Management Board held on 14th and 20th December, 2017 respectively, consideration was given to additional information in respect of the following proposals which had been deferred previously:

 

a)    CYPS 5 – School Improvement – Members asked for more detail in respect of where the saving will come from and the impact on the service, including a description of the minimum service requirement.

b)    PH2 – Withdrawal of £25k funding from homelessness service – further information required detailing the impact of the reduction on the delivery of the homelessness strategy.

 

The Strategic Director of Children and Young People’s Services provided a verbal update in respect of budget proposal CYPS 5 regarding the School Improvement Service. It was explained that the original proposal had been misleading in that the proposal did not relate to school improvement, but rather the Rotherham Youth Enterprise, which formed part of the Education and Skills Service in Children and Young People’s Services. In elaborating on the revised proposal, it was reported that the number of full time equivalent redundancies arising was expected to be seven and the saving from the cessation of the service would be £183,500. In reviewing the proposal, Members expressed concerns regarding the plan to not fill a vacant post in the Early Years service and Members requested an update on this position in June 2018 to understand the impact of not filling the vacancy. Having received the verbal update, Members not willing to support the proposal and requested that a further report fully detailing the proposal be submitted to the next meeting on 31 January 2018.

 

Officers from Housing Services provided additional information on the proposal to withdraw £25,000 of funding for homelessness services from the Public Health budget. Assurances were provided that there would be no impact on homelessness services as there were other resources that could be used to mitigate the removal of the Public Health funding stream, such as the Housing Revenue Account and the Homelessness Grant.

 

Members reflected on the other areas where they had requested further information from the Strategic Director of Regeneration and Environment and noted that this information had been circulated separately and that they were able to provide support to the proposals.

 

Resolved:-

 

1.     That the Strategic Director of Children and Young People’s Services submit a report on the budget proposal in respect of Rotherham Youth Enterprise to the next meeting on 31 January 2018.

 

2.     That, following the assurances provided, the budget proposal in respect of the withdrawal of £25,000 of funding for homelessness from the Public Health budget be supported.


Meeting: 14/12/2017 - Overview and Scrutiny Management Board (Item 61)

61 Budget Options - Regeneration and Environment pdf icon PDF 36 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Chair welcomed the Strategic Director of Regeneration and Environment and other officers, as well as the Cabinet Member for Jobs and the Local Economy, to the meeting.

 

Members considered the following budget proposals:

 

Title

OSMB Comments

Supported

or

Rejected

Additional Actions

Review of Corporate Health and Safety (R&E 1)

Members received assurances in respect of the analysis undertaken by the service in respect of the viability of the proposal

 

Supported

N/A

Increased income/reduced costs from the Market Service (R&E 2a)

Members sought assurances in respect of what was empty liability and how much of the £50k and £75k was attributable to increased income or reduced cost.

 

Members also queried how the Council would increase footfall. It was explained there was a broader approach to this which involved promoting the market, the development of other schemes and a longer term strategy to redefine the town centre to bring more people in

 

Supported in principle, subject to additional clarification being provided

Assistant Director for Planning, Regeneration & Transport to supply information to Members

Increase fee income from A630 Parkway widening project for one year only (R&E 2b – 1)

 

No comments

Supported

N/A

Increase in planning application income or reduce staffing levels if planning applications do not meet the additional target (R&E 2b – 2)

 

No comments

Supported

N/A

RiDO – Deletion of vacant post (R&E 2b)

Members sought assurances that there would be sufficient capacity left within the team if the proposal to delete a post were to be implemented. It was explained that the focus of the team was on bigger strategic workstreams rather than lower level development and it was anticipated that this could be accommodated

 

Supported

N/A

Revenue Income Through Property Investment (R&E 3 – 1)

 

No comment

Supported

N/A

Riverside House Space to Partner (R&E 3 – 2)

Members queried whether the proposal was viable without the landlord’s permission. It was explained that all such projects carried a degree of risk and the biggest risk associated with this was that the proposed tenant could find alternative accommodation. At this stage there was nothing to formally submit and no plans were in place. Members also sought assurances in respect of capacity in legal services to expedite any agreement and the impact on customers in Riverside House. In response, it was confirmed that there was sufficient resources to progress the project and that the impact on customers would be monitored. The proposal was considered to be achievable, but it was noted that it would not deliver a full year saving in 2018-19

 

Supported

N/A

Income from Schools for the provision of Asset Management Services (R&E 3 - 3,4,5,7)

Members queried whether this was an activity that Multi-Academy Trusts (MATs) could deliver in-house and, in addition, whether the Council had investigated grouping all of the services that could be offered to MATs into one corporate package. In response, officers indicated that they  ...  view the full minutes text for item 61