Agenda item

Questions from Members of the Public

 

To receive questions from members of the public who wish to ask a general question in respect of matters within the Council’s area of responsibility or influence.

 

Subject to the Chair’s discretion, members of the public may ask one question and one supplementary question, which should relate to the original question and answer received.

 

Councillors may also ask questions under this agenda item.

 

Minutes:

There were 2 questions:

1. Mr Azam stated that negotiations with Dignity regarding their contract for bereavement services had been ongoing for 11 months. He stated that the community did not know what was going on or when the negotiations were going to conclude. He asked for an update on when the negotiations would be concluded and when the community would be updated.

The Leader explained that he did sympathise and empathise with Mr Azam, but the negotiations were still ongoing. He confirmed that even if the Council decided to change the way the service was provided, there would be uncertainty whilst that change was resolved. The Leader explained that, unfortunately, the uncertainty would continue for a while regardless of how the negotiations concluded. Progress and investments had been made and the Council would continue to deliver the best possible service.

The Assistant Director of Legal, Elections and Registration Services confirmed that discussions continued on the matter, and it was progressing. The Council was protecting the needs of all communities and would continue to do so.

In his supplementary question, Mr Azam stated that the Muslim community was running out of burial space Land that had been earmarked for development was not suitable and plans needed to be produced. He referenced the 35 year plan for Dignity along with the operational plan. However Mr Azam stated that no formal document had been produced by the Council outlining the plan for burial space.

The Assistant Director confirmed that any plans were linked to the negotiations with Dignity. The Council would continue to make sure that a plan was delivered, and this plan would be consulted on with all communities.

2.  Mr Ashraf referenced the question he had asked at the Council meeting in 9 April 2025 and the subsequent response from Councillor Donna Sutton in her role as designated elected spokesperson for South Yorkshire Pensions Authority. The response contained a table specifying details on investments with Israeli companies, bonds and armament companies. Mr Ashraf asked for further detailed clarification on which companies and bonds and how much did each get over the past few years. He confirmed that he was happy to email his question to the Leader to ensure there was no misunderstanding.

The Leader reiterated what had been said at the previous Council meeting regarding that information and again confirmed that it was held by the Pensions Authority which was a separate organisations to the Council and members of the Pensions Authority were separate from the Cabinet. However, the Leader said he would be happy to pass the question on to the Pensions Authority if Mr Ashraf sent it through and a response would be provided.