To be moved by Councillor Tarmey and seconded by Councillor C Carter.
Minutes:
It was moved by Councillor Tarmey and seconded by Councillor C Carter that:
This Council notes:
1.
That speeding fines across England generate around
£100 million per year, all of which is paid directly to HM
Treasury, with no share returned to local authorities.
2.
That councils are responsible for maintaining
highways, improving road safety, delivering traffic calming
schemes, and responding to persistent community concerns about
speeding and dangerous driving.
3.
That local authorities frequently fund enforcement
infrastructure – such as average speed cameras, ANPR
enforcement points, signage, and engineering works – yet
receive no income from the fines issued as a result of these
measures.
4.
That communities across the borough consistently
call for greater investment in traffic calming, crossings, school
street safety, and active travel protection.
5. That the South Yorkshire Safety Camera Partnership brings together law enforcement agencies and local councils across the region. However, Council also notes that there are currently no robust mechanisms for elected members to direct the placement of safety cameras within their wards. This leads to a mismatch between public and elected member perceptions of the need for enforcement activities and the observed locations of mobile cameras.
This Council believes:
1.
That a fairer national funding model is required to
ensure that money raised from speeding offences is reinvested into
the communities where those offences occur.
2.
That enabling councils to retain a proportion of
speeding fine revenue would create a stable, locally controlled
funding stream for road safety improvements.
3. That ring fencing such funding would directly support the Council’s objectives to reduce casualties, protect vulnerable road users, and improve public confidence in local road safety.
Therefore, this Council resolves to:
1. Write to HM Government, the Secretary of State for Transport, and the Chancellor of the Exchequer requesting that:
a. Local authorities receive 50% of the annual revenue generated from speeding fines issued within their area; and
b.
This funding be ring fenced exclusively for road
safety improvements, including average speed cameras, engineering
measures, enforcement support, school safety schemes, and active
travel protection.
2.
Write to the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime for
South Yorkshire to request that robust mechanisms are put in place
to allow elected members to better direct enforcement action within
their wards.
3.
Request that the Local Government Association (LGA)
and the South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority support this
call for reform and lobby Government for a fairer distribution of
speeding fine revenue.
4.
Investigate the feasibility of procuring mobile
pairs of average speed cameras that could be deployed across
different streets in Rotherham to encourage behaviour change,
improve compliance with speed limits, and increase awareness of the
consequences of dangerous driving.
An amendment to the Motion was then moved by Councillor Baum-Dixon and seconded by Councillor Z Collingham that:
The title of the Motion be “We deserve our fair share of funding to help make our roads safer” and that:
|
This Council notes that:
DELETE
INSERT 1 That revenue from fixed penalties issued through speed enforcement is paid into the Consolidated Fund.
2. That councils are responsible for maintaining highways, improving road safety, delivering traffic calming schemes, and responding to persistent community concerns about speeding and dangerous driving.
DELETE
INSERT 3.
That local authorities invest in road
safety measures, including traffic calming, crossings, signage,
engineering works and, where appropriate, speed enforcement
infrastructure, but face competing demands for the funding required
to deliver these measures. 4.
That Rotherham Council has started to
apply more focus to this area, committing £160,000 to develop
Ward Road Safety Plans across all 25 wards. These identify local
concerns and develop a pipeline of capital road safety schemes and
this Council welcomes and supports this work. 5.
That speeding enforcement activity can
fluctuate significantly. South Yorkshire Police recorded 78,438
speeding Notices of Intended Prosecution in 2023, 61,703 in 2024
and 81,554 in 2025. 6. That communities across the borough consistently call for greater investment in traffic calming, crossings, school street safety, and active travel protection. DELETE
INSERT 7. That elected members and local communities have an important role in identifying locations of concern, while decisions on enforcement and the appropriate road safety intervention should be based upon evidence and risk. This Council believes:
DELETE
INSERT 1. That the consequences of speeding and unsafe roads are experienced locally, and communities should have the resources necessary to address those problems.
2. That the purpose of speeding fines should be to deter speeding and improve road safety, not to provide a source of revenue upon which either central or local government becomes financially dependent.
3. That Rotherham needs a clear, long-term and guaranteed road safety funding stream to enable the Council to actually deliver its Ward Road Safety Plans and other schemes.
4. That road safety funding should follow evidence of need and risk rather than the number of fines issued.
5. That successful enforcement should reduce speeding and therefore reduce fine income; it should not also reduce the resources available to make roads safer.
6. That delivery of Rotherham’s Ward Road Safety Plans should not depend upon annual fluctuations in enforcement activity, the number or location of active cameras, the number of offences detected or how individual offences are disposed of.
7. That enforcement activity and the deployment of cameras should be determined by road safety evidence and risk, not by their potential to generate revenue.
8. That greater devolution provides an opportunity to give Rotherham the long-term funding certainty required to deliver locally identified road safety priorities.
9. That enforcement has an important role in road safety, alongside highway design and engineering measures which encourage safe and appropriate speeds.
Therefore, this Council resolves to:
DELETE
INSERT 1. Write to HM Government, the Secretary of State for Transport and the Chancellor of the Exchequer, and through No.10 North, calling for a clear, long-term and guaranteed devolved road safety funding settlement, with a fair and transparent needs-based allocation to Rotherham, to enable the Council to deliver evidence-led schemes identified through its Ward Road Safety Plans.
2. Write to the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime for South Yorkshire to request that robust mechanisms are put in place to allow elected members to better direct enforcement action within their wards.
DELETE
INSERT 3 Request that the Local Government Association and the South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority support the call for a clear, long-term and guaranteed devolved road safety funding settlement based upon evidence of need and risk and ask the Mayor of South Yorkshire and the Leader of Rotherham Council to make representations to Government in support of this approach.
4 Investigate the feasibility of procuring mobile pairs of average speed cameras that could be deployed across different streets in Rotherham to encourage behaviour change, improve compliance with speed limits, and increase awareness of the consequences of dangerous driving. |
On being put to the vote, the amendment fell.
The original motion was then debated and voted on.
The motion was carried.
Supporting documents: