Report from the Strategic Director of Regeneration and Environment.
Recommendations:
That Cabinet:
Minutes:
Consideration was
given to the report which outlined feedback received from the
recent consultation on the Council’s proposed policy in
respect of 20mph speed limits. It provided details of the results
of the consultation and recommended a version of the Policy for
adoption to ensure a consistent approach to the implementation of
20mph speed limits in the Borough. The report also provided an
update on the Council’s proposed position in respect of
handling complaints or requests in respect of parking on
footways.
The consultation ran
on-line between 24 November and 22 December 2023. Although the
stated closing date was 22 December, the consultation was kept open
until 2 January 2024 to allow for any late responses to be
considered. The public consultation was publicised by press
releases which resulted in the publication of articles in the
Rotherham Advertiser and the Sheffield Star and resulted in 114
responses being received.
In summary:
· 44.7% of respondents indicated support for the draft Policy;
· 53.5% of respondents indicated disapproval of the draft Policy.
· 1.8% of respondents did not know whether they support or disapproved.
Amongst the 51 respondents supporting the draft Policy –
· 21 made generally supportive comments
· 11 raised concerns regarding compliance
· 3 comments supporting 20mph speed limits in villages
·
2 wanted 20mph speed limits implementing on busier
roads
Amongst the 59 respondents disapproving of the draft Policy –
· 21 made general adverse comments, including those outside of the scope of the consultation.
· 14 raised concern about compliance.
· 13 raised concern about journey times and/or congestion.
· 11 raised concern regarding vehicle emissions.
· 7 indicated 20mph limits should be reserved for specific locations, in particular schools.
It was worth noting
that, of the 14 objectors raising concerns of compliance, about
two-thirds were of a nature where it might be inferred that there
would be more support if respondents felt the limit would be
effectively enforced. Conversely, two respondents advocating for
much wider or blanket application of 20mph speed limits indicated
support for the Policy notwithstanding its express precluding of
blanket application of 20mph. These discrepancies highlighted the
need for caution in interpreting the consultation response.
The recommended option was therefore to adopt the 20mph Policy
at
Appendix 1, which was
based on the consultation draft and included the clarifying
amendments which responded to the comments received.
Unless and until the Department for Transport update their position
on parking on footways, it was proposed that the Council would
continue to consider requests where prioritised through the Local
Neighbourhood and Road Safety and Minor Schemes programmes, and
where relevant as part of other projects. To inform these
programmes, Officers would continue to log requests from the public
and from Members, along with hotspot locations identified by the
Council’s Highways and Parking Services teams.
Through these programmes, localised interventions would be
considered on a case-by-case basis. Broadly speaking, potential
interventions fell into three categories:
Education and information, including an update of the website to reflect RMBC position on footway parking, and production of printed flyers to be placed on offending vehicles; Physical obstruction (e.g. bollards); and,
Introduction and enforcement of local Traffic Regulation Orders.
If approved the Council’s website would be updated to set out this position, with the text included at Appendix 3.
During the meeting, a correction to recommendation 2 was requested. It should reference paragraph 2.14 through 2.19, not 2.10 through 2.15.
Resolved:
That Cabinet:
1. Notes the findings of the consultation and approves the Policy for the Introduction of 20mph Speed Limits and Zones (Appendix 1.)
2. Approves the proposals in respect of handling complaints or requests in respect of parking on footways, set out in paragraphs 2.14 through 2.19.
Supporting documents: