Report from the Strategic Director of Regeneration and Environment.
Recommendations:
That Cabinet:
1. Approve the procurement of a contractor for the provision of containers, collection, and disposal of food waste, with consideration given to working in partnership with neighbouring authorities.
2. Delegate authority to the Assistant Director of Community Safety and Street Scene in conjunction with the relevant Cabinet member and with the S151 Finance Officer to set fees, charges and vary prices.
Minutes:
Consideration was given to the report which
provided an update on the Business Waste Service. This included an
update on legislative changes, which would require the Council to
consider the implementation of food waste collection options for
Business Customers, alongside a range of options as to how the
Council could achieve this. The report also detailed the current
and future scheme of delegation for setting the prices for the
service.
For the Business Waste Service in Rotherham to compete with the
private sector, the service had to provide their customers with
advice on waste minimisation and offer a collection of paper, card,
plastics, metals, glass and food waste (for companies with more
than 10 employees) by 31 March 2025. The introduction of recycling
to a service required engagement and communication to ensure that
the material is of good quality to maximise the income
generated.
It was recommended that a contractor be procured to deliver this
service. The current Council business waste service had conducted
analysis with all its current customers and only 18% of the
customers would have to contract a food business waste service,
since the legislation was specific to businesses that had 10 or
more employees. If the Council had to collect its own food waste
from just 18% of its customers, a disproportionate amount of
investment in both revenue and capital would be required. This was
set out in option 4 as detailed in the
report. This would include a specialist vehicle, which would only
be utilised for food waste collections and, with the limited demand
that was expected, would have significant periods of time where it
was not in use. Similarly, a driver and loader would also be
required in addition to the existing workforce which again would
not be fully utilised solely via the collection of food waste for
businesses, along with purchasing new receptacles to collect the
food waste. A new procurement exercise would also have to be
performed for food waste disposal which would add cost and
logistical issues as there were no recycling centres for food waste
treatment in the borough.
With this taken into consideration, the pricing model would have
had to be changed across the other business waste streams to
balance out the cost of a food waste collection service, due to so
few anticipated customers, and factoring in the required revenue
and capital investments. If the costs were distributed for food
waste collection and disposal across the other business waste
streams, there was a significant concern that the Council could
lose customers due to price increases and would no longer be
competitive within the marketplace.
Given the time frame for implementation, and the uncertainty of tonnages that would be collected, it was recommended to procure a provider for a short-term contract of 3 years, plus a potential 2-year extension, to allow gathering of data to better inform the scoping of the business food waste collection service. This would then allow the service to produce a report for Cabinet to consider next steps and potentially alternative delivery models.
A key area of decision-making in the Business Waste Service was the
setting of fees and charges, making variations to fees and charges,
allowing discount
offers to be introduced and negotiating individual contracts (within a certain percentage of set fees). This allowed the service to remain competitive within its long-term goal of financial stability. The proposed fees and charges were set out in Exempt Appendix 1. The report sought delegated authority to the Assistant Director of Community Safety and Street Scene in conjunction with the relevant Cabinet member and with the S151 Finance Officer to set fees, charges and vary prices. Any variation to the prices offered to customers had to be in line with the price ranges formally agreed and deviation from the norm would require approval by the Head of Environmental Services.
Resolved:
That Cabinet:
1. Approve the procurement of a contractor for the provision of containers, collection, and disposal of food waste, with consideration given to working in partnership with neighbouring authorities.
2. Delegate authority to the Assistant Director of Community Safety and Street Scene in conjunction with the relevant Cabinet member and with the S151 Finance Officer to set fees, charges and vary prices.
Supporting documents: